The adaptation of Denis Villeneuve in 2021 Dune did what many thought was impossible; a successful theatrical adaptation of Frank Herbert’s 1965 novel. The film remains engaging and easy to follow without sacrificing the essential plot elements. The same cannot be said of the 1984 film version, however, which was criticized for its convoluted portrayal of events and misrepresentation of the characters.
Sadly, many film adaptations of beloved novels suffer the same fate as Duneinterpretation of 1984. Accurately portraying a piece of literature while staying within limits imposed by studios, executives, and production realities can be extremely difficult, and this has led to many weird and bizarre book adaptations on the big screen. doubtful.
While the 1984 version of Dune has maintained some sort of cult appeal over the years, many fans agree that this is a messy adaptation that lacks the point of the original novel it was based on. Heavy on the show and featuring questionable costume designs and special effects, it clung too tightly to the smallest details and simultaneously confused the main plot elements.
It was filmed when it was first premiered, and almost four decades later, the odd, ethnically homogeneous cast and horribly dated visual effects make the viewing experience tense.
10 things I hate about you (1999)
At first glance, the years 1999 10 things I hate about you seems like a relatively mundane romantic comedy meant to target teens and twenties, but it’s actually a well-planned modernization of Shakespeare’s classic tale. The Tamed Shrew.
When an overly protective parent bars their daughter from dating unless her distant sister first gets a date, an attempt to set up two unlikely teenagers turns into an unexpected romance. Shakespeare probably never imagined his story to be so distorted, but 10 things I hate about you Actually strikes a great balance between portraying its source material and introducing modern settings and plot elements.
The Cat in the Hat (2003)
Adaptation of the classic children’s book from 1957 The cat in the hat in a feature film seems like a tall order and, based on its poor critical reception, it seems safe to say it wasn’t a success. A weird project for legendary actors Mike Myers and Alec Baldwin, it was as offbeat as it gets, sounding even weirder than the already weird source material.
The movie’s dated CGI and extravagant humor have only become less tolerable over the years. Still, it seems unfair to expect a quality film from a premise that was never meant to be extended beyond the pages of a children’s storybook.
Francis Ford Coppola’s 1992 interpretation of the classic Bram Stoker novel Dracula is a source of division among horror fans; it’s an epic tale that adds a lot of grandeur to the original tale, but it also deviates a bit from the source material.
There is a lot of subtle terror present in the novel; it is a slow burn that would have horrified readers who did not already know the myth. The 1992 film, however, removes much of the mystery and subtlety, with the great actors and extreme costume designs giving it an overly Hollywood flair that has displeased some devoted fans.
Color Out of Space (2019)
Although the works of HP Lovecraft are often considered important inspirations for many works of modern science fiction and horror, the writer’s stories themselves are very rarely directly adapted. Color out of space, in particular, deals with indescribable events that could never be faithfully engaged in a movie, and the result is an odd mesh of distorting concepts that don’t necessarily blend very well with Nicolas Cage’s ever crazier acting style. .
Despite its impossible premise, Color out of space in fact have done relatively well among critics and the public. It’s definitely odd, but it fits the original Lovecraft story.
One of William Shakespeare’s most famous stories, Macbeth is a tragedy about how feelings of pride and a thirst for power can lead to ruin. It’s complex work that vaguely parodies real-world historical events, but the overall message isn’t necessarily tied to one person or one point in time.
That said, the legendary story doesn’t necessarily translate into the drug trade in Melbourne, Australia in the early 2000s. There are many essential elements of Shakespeare’s tale represented in this bizarre modernization, but the film is so biased and stylized that it is almost more difficult to follow than the original work.
Call of the Wild (2020)
Published in 1903, Jack London’s Call of the wild is an exciting story of survival and adventure set on the far reaches of the Yukon Territories in Canada. A basic story that is often taught in high schools, this seems like a great ground for a film adaptation.
Sadly, although he was bolstered by star power in the form of Harrison Ford, the 2020 adaptation of Call of the wild just fell flat. He’s ditched most of the drama and suspense of the original work in favor of a more family-friendly appeal, but what makes him so weird is the downright poorly made, almost cartoonish CGI dog.
Gulliver’s Travels (2010)
Gulliver’s travels is a classic satirical tale written in 1726 by Irish writer Jonathan Swift. Designed to parody the adventure and travel stories that were popular at the time, it’s a fantastic tale that has survived in popular culture to this day.
Sadly, 2010 saw a Jack Black vehicle of the same name attempt to modernize the story, leaving much of the charm of the process aside. Watching a giant-sized Jack Black wrestle with a massive robot was certainly odd, and it didn’t feel respectful of the original work at all.
Today the Doctor Dolittle The series is best known for the 1998 Eddie Murphy’s comedy, but the property actually started life as a series of short stories written by Hugh Lofting. In these tales, the titular physician acquires the ability to talk to animals and embarks on a series of wild adventures.
While the 2020 Robert Downey Jr. led Dolittle attempts to evoke the adventure inherent in these first stories, it is a more or less incomprehensible mess. Rendered weird as a result of blatant overuse of CGI, Dolittle is something of a difficult movie to watch.
Apocalypse Now (1979)
Apocalypse now is one of the most landmark war movies ever made, but, as an adaptation, it’s undeniably odd. A free interpretation of the novel written by Joseph Conrad in 1899 Heart of darkness, Coppola’s film retains many of the story’s most crucial elements and themes while completely changing the characters, setting, and context.
From absolutely weird cinematography to the legendary weird performance of Marlon Brando, Apocalypse now is weird, wild, and downright uncomfortable in places. Plus, the film’s notoriously troubled production only adds to its uniqueness.
NEXT: 10 Best Stephen King Adaptations, Ranked According To IMDb
90 day fiancé: Liz explains how Big Ed broke his ankle